data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a84c6/a84c650767fc8fb981945a90623c9f65aa296e44" alt=""
First of all, allow me to say that there are at least 3 guilty parties in the origination of such loans. The ones that are the most common are known as “stated income loans.” Mind you that such loans are very, very difficult to come by now, but prior to the meltdown an individual who had a high enough score was able to merely “state” their income instead of providing tax returns, bank statements etc, and be approved for financing.
The initial problem was with the lenders themselves though. For example, the stated income program was originally created to be less burdensome to self-employed income earners. However, in their greed, lenders began to make such programs available to wage earners who could easily manifest pay stubs instead of stating their income, as well as fixed income earners, who could easily manifest their awards letters. Should either of these income groups also be self-employed, I see this stated program as an asset. However, if the borrower was merely a wage earner or living on fixed income, the approval of such borrowers on a stated income program was ripe for fraud.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44411/4441172852737e5d0f33cd55a618324f3f795700" alt=""
In most cases I either lost the deals in my wholesale days because of this stance, or the broker would get wise and never send me a blank loan application again, ensuring that the income was “properly stated.” On one deal in particular with a broker...we'll call him Brian, who now owns a commercial loan origination company out of TX, swore up and down to me that his client really made the income she stated on the loan application. Unfortunately, not only did this woman not make the money stated on the application, but she missed her very first mortgage payment to our company and claimed that she had never stated any such income on her loan application. (Ironically, this same "Brian" spent time in jail shortly after this incidence for manslaughter (in MO) as he killed someone while driving drunk—in spite of the fact that his license was suspended due to other DUI violations. Guess when you break one law without the consideration of consequences, it’s easy to break others).
I lost many residential loan officers at my retail operation as well because of this. When the loan officer couldn’t get a “stated” loan approved in my shop because I turned it down from being submitted due to overinflated income, inevitably some wholesale account reps would tell my loan officers where they could work elsewhere for a less “unreasonable” person and get the deal through with no problem. Individuals who worked for me saw no problem finding the right people to work for who would look the other way and provide such perilous funding in spite of the facts. The deception was they were such nice and enjoyable people to work with otherwise. They simply saw no problem in falsifying the income in order to obtain the largest amount of financing their borrower would ever be responsible for.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14703/1470382e91e34ab7a2b6c0dccc440662112d8f80" alt=""
The little acts of deception do add up folks. And in this instance it’s crumbling our entire nation financially. I believe in “opposition in all things.” If the little bits of deception add up, then certainly can’t the minor acts of honesty, heroism, and proactive efforts for good? I certainly hope so. In fact, I’m banking on it.
Copyright 2009 Kellene Bishop. All rights reserved. You are welcome to repost this information so long as it is credited to Kellene Bishop.